April 27, 2009

Advocacy Project: Letter to Public Official or Letter to the Editor

Senator Richard Durbin
U.S Senate Washington, D.C
309 Hart Senate Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510


Erika

752475 Hoop Drive

Duluth, MN 55812


Dear Senator Richard Durbin,

I am writing this letter to question your support and sponsorship of S.624 bill: A bill to provide 100,000,000 people with first-time access to safe drinking water and sanitation on a sustainable basis by 2015 by improving the capacity of the United States Government to fully implement the Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act of 2005. There are a few questions and concerns I have with this bill.


After doing further research on this topic, I had found an interesting fact on the Senator Paul Simon: Water for the Poor Act of 2005 website. "Today, more than 1 billion people lack access to improved water sources and more than 2 billion people lack access to improved sanitation. At any given point in time, people suffering from water-related diseases occupy over 50 percent of the world’s hospital beds. Each year, nearly 2 million people - most children under five - die from diarrhea, a disease that is easily preventable through safe water supply, sanitation, and hygiene. Beyond its impacts on human health, sound water management is critical to promoting economic growth, ensuring sustainable food supplies, and preserving ecosystems upon which most of the world's inhabitants depend.” This was an interesting fact and I am very happy to see that someone wants to do something about the health and water disparities in growing, urban countries. On the other hand, what about our own country? Shouldn’t proposed bills that would restore the scope of the Clean Water Act to cover all federal waters, including wetlands and smaller streams that have fallen into question under the Bush administration be our main concern right now with a new President in office?


The next concern I have with providing an accessible source of sanitary water is the cost to our country. If this is done, will water within the United State be privatized and become more expensive for rural families that already cannot afford a water bill? Privatization of the United States water would cause an increase in revenue from water companies but also put many individuals throughout the States out of a job.


I believe that before this bill is passed, water problems in our country need to be dealt with. How can we help a country build their water and water sanitation systems when we do not have a good system? Therefore, I ask you Senator Richard Durbin; consider your own country’s problems before trying to solve the worlds.


Thank you,

Erika

April 22, 2009

Share and Voice: Earthship

I don't know how many of you have heard of the "Earth Ship" buildings but they are SO cool!

Who They Are and What They Do:

Earthship Biotecture is a global company offering proven, totally sustainable design and construction services worldwide. Our company is led by Michael Reynolds, the principle biotect and creator of the Earthship Concept.

Design / Construction Services:

Single family residence, Residential developments, Commercial Structures, Demonstration and Disaster Relief Projects. World-Wide

An earthship is the ultimate in ecohome design and construction. A completely independent building design leading the industry of green building, sustainable design and construction.



The 6 Principles that define an Earthship:

1) Thermal/Solar Heating and Cooling Systems
2) Solar and Wind Electricity
3) Contained Sewage Treatment
4) Building with Natural and Recycled Materials
5) Water Harvesting
6) Food Production


Check it out: http://www.earthship.net/


Be sure to look at their image gallery: http://www.earthship.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=447&Itemid=95

April 20, 2009

Advocacy Project: Issue Overview

Issue/Problem and Current Legislation

As of March 17, 2009 the S. 624 - Senator Paul Simon Water for the World Act of 2009
has been introduced and has been read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. With the hopes of the bill being past, there will be access to safe water and sanitation for developing countries. The Secretary of State to will be required to develop a strategy to promote the role of water and sanitation policy and improve the effectiveness of United States assistance programs. This bill is directly correlated to The Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-121). After reviewing the findings, the bill has been redesigned to meet new and improved goals for the year of 2015.

Who is affected by the issue

The main people affected by this are the poor and people who live in rural areas. The Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act is working to provide safe and sanitary water for those in need. The act affects people in developing countries and the United States because it is the country that is working to help developing countries and their water issues. "Today, more than 1 billion people lack access to improved water sources and more than 2 billion people lack access to improved sanitation. At any given point in time, over 50 percent of the world's hospital beds are occupied by people suffering from water-related diseases. Each year, nearly 2 million people - most children under five - die from diarrhea, a disease which is easily preventable through safe water supply, sanitation, and hygiene. Beyond its impacts on human health, sound water management is critical to promoting economic growth, ensuring sustainable food supplies, and preserving ecosystems upon which most of the world's inhabitants depend. Water may also become a source of tension. More than 260 watersheds are shared by two or more countries."

Many of the people that are impacted the most by this issue live in under-developed countries that don't have the money to distribute water to rural areas. By this bill being passed, these under-developed, rural countries will receive the sanitary water that they deserve.

The United States will benefit and lose from this bill being passed. We, as a country, will have the opportunity to help smaller, developing countries is need. But the money for all of the other countries water development will be coming out of our tax payers pocket. There may be many individuals who believe that this bill should not be passed because directly, it does not impact us.

What are the consequences of the issue?

If this bill were to be passed, the main consequence is the money that it will take. Not only could the sanitation and delivery of water be expensive, it also would take a lot of time and effort to acquire all the assets and resources needed to make the changes necessary once the bill has been passed.

Not only will there be issues with the resources, but once the country becomes more developed there is a higher chance for pollution rates throughout these developing countries. This could start many different health problems among people who are inhaling toxic chemicals companies are making, using and have lingering through the air.

What is the economic/social impact of the issue?

Because this is a bill that the United States is trying to pass to help developing countries water issues, the money will be coming out of our pockets. We will be the country who bears the majority of the economic costs.

Current sources of financing for water investments are drawn from a mix of several sources, including :

  • Domestic public sector financing at the national or local level (from taxes, user fees, public debt, etc.) [64% of total expenditures];
  • Direct investments from domestic private sources [19% of total expenditures];
  • Direct investments from international private sources [5% of total expenditures]; and
  • International sources of support and cooperation (including multilateral and bilateral Official Development Assistance (ODA)) [12% of total expenditures]

This could create controversy between tax payers and the Senate who has fought to get the bill passed, there may be more issues and controversy between whether the water in country should be free for all individuals or if it should be paid for. If the bill is not passed, there are direct investments that individuals have made to be spent on the water sanitation issue, and this money will be lost.

All of the money that is spent developing water sanitation and water delivery systems will economically benefit the countries that are developing. These systems will create more jobs for people that are living in urban and under-developed areas, it will create an economic money flow for the country and provide the opportunity for more developments.

What are the barriers?

Because this bill effects more people than just the citizens of the United States, it may be difficult for communication between all of the other countries leaders. There are different demands for different countries, different demographics and geographical areas that will need to be assessed and figuring out all of these while making sure all needs are met can/will be difficult and time consuming.

These barriers can be over come doing research to design and implement a system that would help with communication barriers. Once this is accomplished, there will need to be an organized database of each countries specific needs, what type of demographics will be included and the geographic areas that are going to be dealt with.

What is the history of this issue?

This is an issue that has been addressed for the past 10 years. It was an bill that they were opening to pass in 2005 and an objective that Healthy People 2010 had wanted to meet. Since then, the bill has been revised with the hopes of being passed in 2015.

Your Recommendation

I believe that this is a bill that should be passed. Currently, many people in the United States have the luxury of sanitary water that is easily accessible. For myself, I could not imagine not having water available to me whenever I wanted or needed it.


April 17, 2009

Reflection: Weeks 11 & 12

Can you believe that we only have three weeks of class left?!

Week 11:

During this week we had watched a documentary titled "Unnatural Causes: In Sickness and in Wealth". This documentary was a real eye opener! It's very true that the wealthier you are, the better health you are in. I also found it very interesting that sometimes how wealthy you are does not matter, but the color of your skin does. It's a shame that the United States has all this money and is the richest world in the country, but that there isn't equal health care and health opportunities for everyone living here. During this week we also started more advocacy projects! Dr.V showed us how to use Thomas and the State and Legislative Bill website. I look forward to finishing this project within the next few weeks!

Week 12:

This Tuesday was centered around the advocacy project we are doing for Monday. We had discussed how it was important to know as much information about the issue we're looking into so that if or when we get a response for the person we send our letter to, we're prepared for any question they ask us or statement we need to make. This is a very important skill to have when working in the "real world" and having to explain/persuade people to agree with you, and fight for a change.

On Thursday Shar and Dr. V switched roles for the first half of class and we discussed reading 20. This part of class was quiet humorous :) We also took a picture and created a card for SuperOne! I feel like our class is starting to bond a lot more since a majority of people in class are beginning to feel comfortable sharing their opinions and opening up to everyone... I like it :)


I look forward to finishing off the semester with everyone! :)

April 13, 2009

Advocacy Project: Healthy People/THOMAS

Focus Area 8: Environmental Health
8-29. Global deaths from poor sanitation, water, or hygiene


- Met target by 161%

Target:
2,135,000 deaths.

Baseline:
2,668,200 deaths worldwide were attributable to these factors in 1990.

Target setting method:
20 percent improvement.

Data source:
World Health Report 2003, World Health Organization.

According to the Progress Quotient Chart for Focus Area 8: Environmental Health, here is how the figured the targeted change achieved.

Years in parentheses represent the baseline data year and the most recent data year used to compute the percent of the Health People 2010 target achieved

Emerging Issues:
Increased international travel and improvements in telecommunications and computer technology are making the world a smaller place. Actions in each country affect the environment and influence events around the world. For example, over the next several decades, more people will face water quality and quantity problems because of worldwide water shortages, especially in developing countries.


S.624 : A bill to provide 100,000,000 people with first-time access to safe drinking water and sanitation on a sustainable basis by 2015 by improving the capacity of the United States Government to fully implement the Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act of 2005.

Sponsor: Sen Richard Durbin (IL)
Cosponsors: Sen. Bob Corker (TN) and Sen Patty Murray (WA)

Latest Major Action: 3/17/2009 Referred to Senate committee.

Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

My Political Representatives: Amy Klobuchar


After watching documentaries in class and reading about our national water scarcity issue, I believe that providing safe drinking water to everyone is very important. Water is a right to everyone and individuals should not have to worry about getting sick or dying from the water that they have access to and are drinking. There are ways that this issue could be handled, and the first would be to write a letter to my political representative, which is Amy Klobuchar.

Although this target has been met, it is a subject that will always have area for improvement.

April 4, 2009

Reflections: Week 9 & 10

(Photo taken at the Apostle Islands)


These past two weeks have been a whirlwind!





Week 9:



During this week, we were taught about advocacy and the importance of it. We were taught the ethics of it and how it relates to our Seven Responsibilities of Health Educators. I thought that this was interesting becaus it's always nice to see what you're learning and how will relate to the responsibilities of a future job possibility.



Throughout this week we also did a project on our Political Representatives. We were asked to make a blog post that have all of the following information: our President, State Legislatures, Governor, City Counselmen and Duluth's Mayor. This was interesting to me because I did not know that Duluth had different counselmen for the different Districts. After looking into this more, I found that I live in the District 2 area! :)





Week 10:



This week we did not meet as a class (as well as two of my other classes :) ) but we were assigned a project to have finished this past Thursday for Dr. V to look at once she returned to lovely Minnesota weather... This project was a photo essay. My original idea (littering of the rivers, streams and lakes in Duluth) for this project was ruined by the snow, so I had to go back to the drawing table and think of something else. I did a little research and the area I had traveled to over spring break, Jekyll Island, GA, and found something quiet interesting about the bridge I had a picture of. The brigde that connects Jekyyll Island and Brunswick was built in 2002 and while in the process of building, the builders had taken into account the animals that live in the swampy areas underneath. Each year, turtles migrate to Jekyll Island and in the middle of the night, by moonlight, the leave the island to find new areas to live. The builders paid attention to this aspect and installed lighting system that provides enough light for drivers on the bridge but won't effect the turtle who will be navigating by the moon. Cool right?!



Well, that's it for my Week 9 and 10! I look forward to the rest of the semester and seeing what we talk about as a class and what information I will take away as an individual!


April 2, 2009

Eye Opener: Photo Essay

When I decided what I was going to do for this project, my idea was immediately ruined by the snow... So, I thought of what I did over spring break and if there were any pictures that I could use for this project... Here's what I came up with!

The bridge that is seen here is the Sidney Lanier Bridge that is located in Brunswick, Georgia. The original bridge was built in 1956 and has been recently re-built and improved! (It was originally built by the same company that had built I-35W that had collapsed in 2007).



After visiting Georgia, I did some research. I found that this bridge, which is a cable-stayed bridge (cables support the bridge deck) completed back in 2002, actually is environmentally friendly!

The most southern part of Georgia is VERY popular for turtles and where they lay their eggs... Once the turtles are hatched, they end up migrating back to the water by following the moon light. Since the Sidney Lanier Bridge is a popular port in Georgia, it is very important for there to be proper lighting for ships entering and leaving the area. It was important that "to keep lights on the 4,000 foot-long, cable-stayed Sidney Lanier Bridge from disorienting the migrating turtles, the Georgia Department of Transportation worked with the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to install a minimum number of lights on both the bridge deck and the approach road and to use shielded low-sodium, low-wattage lights that cut glare and light scatter. Since every season there are an estimated 100-120 turtle eggs laid in each nest on the island beaches and on average approximately 64,000 of the nestlings make it to the water, the lights may protect a large number of turtles. "

I found it VERY interesting that the people who built this bridge, were looking out for the turtles and doing whatever possible to help continue their migration in Brunswick, Georgia!